Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie streaming sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, that is one worker whom keeps his own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just walked in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for 6 months for criminal damage and control of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of those two tales is just a bit more frightening, due to the fact axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he did not comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ as well as the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way casinopokies777.com of a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is associated with the concept that neighboring communities will be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of applicants whom have suggested that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that might be situated in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power on the whole vote. In other terms, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is also a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large number of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with all the guidelines and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is not a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a hard stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their office ended up being accused of editing his Wikipedia page to show comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.